Obvious statement: Being in a committed relationship is definitely more difficult than being single. In the past months since Jordan and I got engaged, we've seen some of the hardest times in our relationship yet, and that's coming out of three years of serious dating.
About a week ago, Jordan and I were sitting in the Baptist Student Union on campus with our friends, Paul and Kristen, who are also a couple. As Paul and Jordan vehemently (and loudly) discussed church orthodoxy, Kristen and I chatted. She asked me about what our plans for the future are, and I told her that it somewhat depends on what kind of job Jordan gets, and where.
"Yeah," she said, "it gets hard when you have two people, because it's like, 'Well, I got a job here, but you got a job there . . .'"
That's one of the first things I'm learning about commitment, and sacrifice. The decisions I make no longer affect only me and my future and plans, and the same goes for Jordan. I think part of being unified as husband and wife means that when I make a decision, I'm not only thinking about myself - as in, Sarah - but "myself" has expanded to become Sarah and Jordan.
We talked about some of these things at our final pre-marital counseling session last Saturday. But before I get into that, I'm going to throw in a plug here: if you're engaged, I highly recommend that you look into some kind of pre-marital counseling. It's so beneficial to actually be thinking and talking about all the different nitty gritty details and nuances that are thrown into the complex, strange, exciting world of marriage. Like decisions-making, for example.
We've been doing pre-marital under the guidance of Dan and Trudy, a couple from church who has been in charge of the pre-marital front for a while. Last Saturday we doubled up to make-up the lesson we missed when we went to France for my grandfather's funeral the week before. The make-up lesson focused on the role and duties of the wife, and one of the things that came up was decision-making. I was pretty exhausted, and it was past 9:00 by the time we got into the second lesson, so I hadn't been doing a lot of talking. Jordan was the one who brought up this question:
How we should approach decisions that are of a larger-scale, such as where we're going to live? Jordan aptly explained that of the two of us, I am the one who has more trouble establishing a solid group of friends and that I really missed the community I left behind when I moved from California back home to New Mexico. As he talked, I started to get choked up, because everything he was saying was true. But I also hadn't realized that he had such a complete understanding of my feelings, and my desires.
Dan and Trudy gave us some criteria for making decisions, including spiritual factors and pragmatic factors. Of course, finances are a big part of deciding to make such a big move. But, as Trudy pointed out, my spiritual health is something to be considered, and to be considered seriously. Since it's harder for me to form deep friendships with people, it's significant to consider what would be best for me in that regard.
And then, as we were talking about indecision, Dan said something that completely blew my mind.
"Go before God together, even in indecision," he said. "It's OK to say, 'God, we don't know what to do here. This is her side, this is his side, and we can't tell what the right thing to do is."
As I've gone through various phases of indecision (often long and drawn out, and very emotionally and spiritually taxing), many people have given me similar advice: that it's alright to be unsure. It's even OK to make a decision without being entirely sure if it's right. Faith shines in times of uncertainty. In a big way, that's sort of what faith means: to have a deeper certainty and peace beneath the tumultuous ocean of choices and possible paths to take. God is good, Christ is Lord, and we have been granted eternal life and salvation from sin. Those are pretty big rocks to stand on in times of trouble. At least, they ought to be, but I'm sad to say that even as I'm writing this, I am not bereft of troubles. Even the relatively small ones, when they start gnawing, can blind me to the security I have in Christ.
Even though I've been advised similarly in the past, it's almost novel to me that Jordan and I can be in indecision, but at peace. Secure. Faith-full. I often think of indecision, or differences in opinion or desires, as sources of conflict; I'd never considered the paradoxical notion of being united in that kind of division.
I spoke earlier of the relationship cliches I hear thrown around so much; within Christian conversation, there seems to be an entirely other set of stock phrases. I'm hesitant to call Scripture cliche, but the most common one I can think of is "love your wives as Christ loves the church." Taken from Ephesians 5:25-33, which says, in its entirety:
"Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, the she might holy and without blemish. In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes it and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body. 'Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.' This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. However, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband."
OK, that's pretty packed, and a tall order for husbands. When I say that the phrase, "love your wife as Christ loves the church" is cliche, what I mean is that it's something I've heard for as long as I can remember, but I've never really understood exactly what it means. It usually conjures up ideas of sacrifice and stewardship, but that's not satisfying. Maybe no one really gets it until they're married; heck, maybe no one ever really gets it. After all, it's difficult to comprehend the enormity of Christ's love and sacrifice. However, in the past few weeks, I think I've begun to formulate a clearer understanding for myself.
In times of uncertainty, I focus my energy on relying on and trusting in God. For Christians, our security in him ought to provide that peace that surpasses understanding. Marriage, I believe, is a microcosm of that. In times of uncertainty, which we are experiencing now and, I'm sure, many more times in the future, our marriage covenant can be our source of peace and security. A married acquaintance of mine put it this way: so many people think that marriage is a loss of freedom; it's actually quite freeing. That lifelong commitment that can scare people - it's scared me - provides a unique kind of freedom. The freedom that comes in knowing that no matter what, this person is committed to being with me, working with me, loving me, crying with me, helping me, encouraging me, guiding me. And, being uncertain with me.
The key in all of this is "with me." Of course, there is a great deal of self-sacrifice that comes with marriage, much of which I'm sure I don't even know about yet. Sacrifice is also part of the "as Christ loves the church" thing. But to pledge unity even in times of uncertainty or disagreement; that's our reward for such sacrifice. It's a promise that runs deeper than any trouble we may face, one that binds us together at the core of all things.
One that God has forged, and no man shall separate.